+77%
Median federal debt at exit
Median federal debt at exit at Modern Technology School rose 77% between 2006 and 2009 ($6.6k → $11.8k).
California · Private for-profit · Predominantly certificates
Modern Technology School
Fountain Valley, California. 99 undergraduate students. 3 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
ANOMALY ENGINE · NOTABLE SIGNALS
What the data flags at Modern Technology School
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
-100%
3-year cohort default rate
3-year cohort default rate at Modern Technology School fell 100% between 2021 and 2024 (3.3% → 0.0%).
-13%
First-year retention
First-year retention at Modern Technology School fell 13% between 2006 and 2009 (98.0% → 85.7%).
+72%
For-profit certificate-predominant peer
10-year earnings at Modern Technology School are 72% above the for-profit certificate-predominant peer median ($50.7k vs $29.5k).
SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT
The numbers, vs. California
Each tile compares this institution to the California median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
$50,667+9% · 6→10y
California median $42,588$46,631
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry78.6%+3% · '98→'09
California median 61.3%$11,430+77% · '97→'09
At program completion99-37% · '96→'09
latest IPEDS82.3%-14% · '04→'09
first-time, full-time—-38% · '07→'15
latest cohort—
annualSECTION 02 · EARNINGS HORIZONS
How earnings spread, 4 to 10 years after entry
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Earnings widen with time post-entry. Selection: federal-aid recipients only — not all graduates.Methodology →
SECTION 03 · DEBT-TO-EARNINGS
What loans cost relative to earnings
Annual debt service as a share of median earnings 10 years after entry, computed under federal Direct loan terms (10-year fixed at 6%). The 8% line is the gainful-employment threshold from federal regulation; above 12% has historically been considered “failing” under prior rule cycles.
Institution-wide
3.0%Median federal debt $11,430 amortized over 10 years vs. median earnings $50,667 (10y after entry).
SECTION 04 · LONG ARC
Ten-plus year arc
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
Undergraduate enrollment.
150%-time completion rate.
Median federal student debt at exit.
-14%
Modern Technology School · retention fell
100.0% → 85.7%
-37%
Modern Technology School · undergrad enrollment fell
258 → 163
+77%
Modern Technology School · median debt rose
$6,625 → $11,750
-100%
Modern Technology School · cohort default rate fell
15.9% → 0.0%
+199%
Modern Technology School · pell share rose
20.9% → 62.6%
+35%
Modern Technology School · earnings_median_8yr rose
$33,100 → $44,714
SECTION 05 · PROGRAMS
Ranked by 5-year earnings
Each row is one (CIP × credential) program reported by the institution in College Scorecard's Field-of-Study data. Cohort floor is 30 students; below this, federal data is suppressed.
SECTION 06 · BY CIP FAMILY
2 programs with earnings, grouped
Programs are grouped by 2-digit CIP family. Programs without reported earnings are hidden to keep the list focused.
HEALTH PROFESSIONS · CIP 51
CIP 61 · CIP 61
SECTION 07 · SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS
Same sector and degree mix in California
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
CAUSAL DISCIPLINE
“Modern Technology School graduates earn $X” — not “Modern Technology School makes you earn $X”
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Modern Technology School caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.