Undergraduate enrollment
Undergraduate enrollment at Mt. Diablo Adult Education-Mt. Diablo USD fell 21% between 2006 and 2009 (494 → 391).
Concord, California. 153 undergraduate students. 5 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
Undergraduate enrollment at Mt. Diablo Adult Education-Mt. Diablo USD fell 21% between 2006 and 2009 (494 → 391).
150%-time completion at Mt. Diablo Adult Education-Mt. Diablo USD fell 10% between 2006 and 2009 (80.5% → 72.1%).
150%-time completion fell 8 pp at Mt. Diablo Adult Education-Mt. Diablo USD vs the 2003–2007 baseline (68.6% vs 77.0%).
Each tile compares this institution to the California median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
2,235 → 391
6.1% → 9.7%
Each row is one (CIP × credential) program reported by the institution in College Scorecard's Field-of-Study data. Cohort floor is 30 students; below this, federal data is suppressed.
Programs are grouped by 2-digit CIP family. Programs without reported earnings are hidden to keep the list focused.
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Mt. Diablo Adult Education-Mt. Diablo USD caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.