Private nonprofit bachelor's-predominant peer
10-year earnings at Shasta Bible College and Graduate School are 56% below the private nonprofit bachelor's-predominant peer median ($28.9k vs $65.3k).
Redding, California. 12 undergraduate students. 10 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
10-year earnings at Shasta Bible College and Graduate School are 56% below the private nonprofit bachelor's-predominant peer median ($28.9k vs $65.3k).
In-state tuition at Shasta Bible College and Graduate School rose 33% between 2007 and 2010 ($7.7k → $10.2k).
Undergraduate enrollment at Shasta Bible College and Graduate School fell 17% between 2007 and 2010 (65 → 54).
Out-of-state tuition at Shasta Bible College and Graduate School rose 13% between 2021 and 2024 ($12.9k → $14.5k).
Each tile compares this institution to the California median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
100.0% → 0.0%
75.0% → 85.7%
$5,825 → $10,220
$5,825 → $14,535
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Shasta Bible College and Graduate School caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.