Oklahoma · Public · Predominantly certificates

Central Technology Center

Drumright, Oklahoma. 564 undergraduate students. 33 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.

ANOMALY ENGINE · NOTABLE SIGNALS

What the data flags at Central Technology Center

Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.

LONG-ARC SHIFT · TRENDING WORSE-20%

150%-time completion

150%-time completion at Central Technology Center fell 20% between 2006 and 2009 (87.2% → 69.6%).

LONG-ARC SHIFT · TRENDING BETTER+75%

Undergraduate enrollment

Undergraduate enrollment at Central Technology Center rose 75% between 2006 and 2009 (160 → 280).

SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT

The numbers, vs. Oklahoma

Each tile compares this institution to the Oklahoma median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.

MEDIAN EARNINGS · 10Y
$36,351+17% · 6→10y
Oklahoma median $38,465
MEDIAN EARNINGS · 6Y
$31,051
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry
COMPLETION · 150%
93.0%-18% · '97→'09
Oklahoma median 52.9%
MEDIAN FEDERAL DEBT
At program completion
UNDERGRAD ENROLLMENT
564-86% · '96→'09
latest IPEDS
RETENTION
16.8%-48% · '04→'24
first-time, full-time
ADMISSION RATE
+121% · '01→'09
latest cohort
IN-STATE TUITION
annual
SECTION 02 · EARNINGS HORIZONS

How earnings spread, 4 to 10 years after entry

Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).

ALL FEDERALLY AIDED STUDENTS · TAX-RECORD EARNINGSVINTAGE 2025-05
Earnings widen with time post-entry. Selection: federal-aid recipients only — not all graduates.Methodology →
SECTION 04 · LONG ARC

Ten-plus year arc

Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.

UNDERGRAD · 19962009280
3,08913519962009
Undergraduate enrollment.IPEDS EF
COMPLETION 150% · 1997200969.6%
100%34%19972009
150%-time completion rate.IPEDS GR
RETENTION · 20042024-48%

Central Technology Center · retention fell

50.0% → 26.2%

UNDERGRAD ENROLLMENT · 19962009-86%

Central Technology Center · undergrad enrollment fell

1,948 → 280

PELL SHARE · 20082024-58%

Central Technology Center · pell share fell

13.1% → 5.5%

EARNINGS_MEDIAN_10YR · 20072020+30%

Central Technology Center · earnings_median_10yr rose

$28,000 → $36,351

EARNINGS_MEDIAN_8YR · 20052020+38%

Central Technology Center · earnings_median_8yr rose

$23,000 → $31,733

FINANCIAL OUTCOME · ILLUSTRATION

Estimate the financial outcome at Central Technology Center

Pick a program. Cost from Scorecard net price by family income; earnings from Treasury 5-year-post-completion median, projected forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve. The selection-bias toggle applies the Dale-Krueger shrinkage. Outcomes illustration, not a forecast — see methodology.

Shrinks the earnings premium toward the matched-applicant mean. STEM <15%, business ~40%, arts & education ~60%.

EARNINGS SUPPRESSED

Federal privacy rules suppressed earnings for Ground Transportation · Undergraduate Certificate or Diploma at Central Technology Center(cohort below 30 students). The calculator can’t produce a number we’d stand behind, so we don’t.

Outcomes illustration · not a forecast. Projects observed Scorecard earnings forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve under your assumptions. See methodology for the math.

CAUSAL DISCIPLINE

Central Technology Center graduates earn $X” — not “Central Technology Center makes you earn $X”

Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Central Technology Center caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.

Methodology →