-100%
3-year cohort default rate
3-year cohort default rate at Fred W Eberle Technical Center fell 100% between 2011 and 2012 (33.3% → 0.0%).
West Virginia · Public · Predominantly certificates
Fred W Eberle Technical Center
Buckhannon, West Virginia. 119 undergraduate students. 8 programs in the federal Field-of-Study dataset.
ANOMALY ENGINE · NOTABLE SIGNALS
What the data flags at Fred W Eberle Technical Center
Short-arc shifts (recent 3-year window), peer outliers, earnings trend breaks, completion drops, enrollment cliffs, and debt-to-earnings warnings — surfaced deterministically from the federal record. Multi-decade shifts are reported separately in the Long Arc section, since 25-year tuition drift isn't really an anomaly.
+18%
150%-time completion
150%-time completion at Fred W Eberle Technical Center rose 17% between 2006 and 2009 (83.6% → 98.2%).
SECTION 01 · OUTCOMES SNAPSHOT
The numbers, vs. West Virginia
Each tile compares this institution to the West Virginia median for the same metric. Sub-line shows the comparison value, not an interpretation. Sparklines trace the federally available history.
$43,364+13% · 6→10y
West Virginia median $37,714$38,251
Treasury earnings · 6y post-entry99.1%+64% · '97→'09
West Virginia median 61.2%—
At program completion119+506% · '96→'24
latest IPEDS89.4%-5% · '04→'24
first-time, full-time—
latest cohort—-11% · '00→'05
annualSECTION 02 · EARNINGS HORIZONS
How earnings spread, 4 to 10 years after entry
Treasury tax-record earnings for federally aided students who first enrolled at this institution. Each point is a horizon from the most-recent vintage. Single median per horizon (no p25/p75 publishing).
Earnings widen with time post-entry. Selection: federal-aid recipients only — not all graduates.Methodology →
SECTION 04 · LONG ARC
Ten-plus year arc
Federally available history. Coverage varies by metric — IPEDS publishes some series only after 2009 and others only before.
Undergraduate enrollment.
150%-time completion rate.
+64%
Fred W Eberle Technical Center · completion · 150% rose
60.0% → 98.2%
+46%
Fred W Eberle Technical Center · undergrad enrollment rose
18 → 109
-100%
Fred W Eberle Technical Center · cohort default rate fell
33.3% → 0.0%
+99%
Fred W Eberle Technical Center · pell share rose
42.4% → 84.6%
+38%
Fred W Eberle Technical Center · earnings_median_10yr rose
$31,400 → $43,364
+22%
Fred W Eberle Technical Center · earnings_median_8yr rose
$34,500 → $42,099
+95%
Fred W Eberle Technical Center · earnings_median_6yr rose
$19,600 → $38,251
FINANCIAL OUTCOME · ILLUSTRATION
Estimate the financial outcome at Fred W Eberle Technical Center
Pick a program. Cost from Scorecard net price by family income; earnings from Treasury 5-year-post-completion median, projected forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve. The selection-bias toggle applies the Dale-Krueger shrinkage. Outcomes illustration, not a forecast — see methodology.
Shrinks the earnings premium toward the matched-applicant mean. STEM <15%, business ~40%, arts & education ~60%.
EARNINGS SUPPRESSED
Federal privacy rules suppressed earnings for Practical Nursing, Vocational Nursing and Nursing Assistants · Undergraduate Certificate or Diploma at Fred W Eberle Technical Center(cohort below 30 students). The calculator can’t produce a number we’d stand behind, so we don’t.
Outcomes illustration · not a forecast. Projects observed Scorecard earnings forward with a Mincer age-earnings curve under your assumptions. See methodology for the math.
SECTION 07 · SIMILAR INSTITUTIONS
Same sector and degree mix in West Virginia
Picked by Carnegie sector × predominant credential level. These are not rankings — just nearest-neighbour surfaces for comparison.
CAUSAL DISCIPLINE
“Fred W Eberle Technical Center graduates earn $X” — not “Fred W Eberle Technical Center makes you earn $X”
Median earnings describe what cohorts earned. They do not describe what attending Fred W Eberle Technical Center caused. Selection effects (who admits, who enrolls, who completes) are real. We publish federal data with strict descriptive phrasing — and link the methodology where you can read about the limitations directly.